Issue 45: The one HS class you must take to succeed at CMU, plus top performers in Carnegie’s admissions office
“Don’t just ask the teachers to write your letter of recommendation where you got an A in the class; that’s not really helpful to me.” Carnegie admissions director answers Inna, Anushka, Sonia, Nancy, and Kyle’s questions. This week, SocratesPost and Deborah discuss the SAT adversity score, admissions training, and reader-submitted questions. To catch up from last week, click here.
Exclusive Insider Interview: Assistant Director of Admissions, Carnegie Mellon University
Mercy at SocratesPost: When you read an essay or an application like that, are you also looking for clues that it’s authentic and that a counselor or consultant hasn’t helped with it too much? Or is that not something you really look for?
Deborah at Carnegie Mellon: There was an incident that happened last year where an outside student was trying to impersonate someone, which was a whole mess. So, we try to focus on making sure that things are secure, but every once in a while, there might be something that’s a little bit fishy. But because it’s a community-based process; you’re not the only one who’s reading it. I think that helps, too, when you are reading things and you think, “Oh, this is a little bit off,” but I can’t remember that happening recently.
Mercy at SocratesPost: It sounds like if you have questions or concerns, you’ll bring it up to the committee. Together, you’ll evaluate whether or not it’s inauthentic enough to do something about. Let’s move on to training. How do you think the training for Carnegie Mellon admissions differed from the training you’ve received at the other institutions’ admissions departments?
Deborah at Carnegie Mellon: At SCAD, we were separated, so there were people who traveled and recruited students and people on campus who read applications. I didn’t read applications at SCAD, but I did read applications as an intern for the Office of Admissions at GW. I would say at GW, the training was not as in depth. It was three or four hours one day, but I was also in the office and my mentor was there, so when I did have questions, I could talk to them.
Mercy at SocratesPost: How is that different from CMU?
Deborah at Carnegie Mellon: At CMU, it’s two and a half days, pretty much six hours each day, so it’s very in depth. Part of it is also because we have outside readers. We have about 25 outside readers and then 25 people in the office who read, so about 50 readers total. This year, we also had an outside reading to do, called The Tyranny of the Meritocracy, which wasn’t as much for us as it was for the outside readers.
Mercy at SocratesPost: What was the purpose of the outside reading?
Deborah at Carnegie Mellon: We aren’t understanding some of these bigger conversations that are happening in the education world. We read applications from a previous year to learn how to read an application, how to discuss it, how to fill out all the information, and understand how to work the system. We did it more in a small group basis, so your group with your team leader is focused on the same college, because they’re all looking for different things.
Mercy at SocratesPost: Among the 25 in the office and the 25 outside readers, everyone comes in from different backgrounds. Based on your observations, what separates a top performer from the rest?
Deborah at Carnegie Mellon: I think it’s when you’re able to shape the context of the student without letting those other factors in the context slow your decision. For instance, I’m going to use an extreme example here, if you’re reading an application for a student who had Cs on their transcript in junior or senior year, but in sophomore year they were an A/B student, I’m trying to understand the context of this difference. Maybe I’ll see that they switched to a super rigorous school for junior year or in reading their essay, maybe something happened outside of school. Maybe there’s a family situation or health issue or something else popped up.
You’re trying to understand the context, but then thinking about other clues. What are the letters of recommendation saying, what are the SAT or ACT scores, and are things matching up? People go through terrible things; I will be the first one to admit that. But because an application makes me cry or I have sympathy or empathy for someone that I’m reading doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re going to be successful at Carnegie Mellon. Carnegie Mellon is a very difficult institution. I can guarantee that if you call a student in each of the different colleges, one of the first things they would say about Carnegie Mellon is that it’s hard. It’s very rigorous.
Mercy at SocratesPost: Tell me more about why just because you have sympathy for someone, you can’t admit them to Carnegie Mellon.
Mercy at SocratesPost: Do you have another example of understanding context?
Mercy at SocratesPost: That makes sense. At the end of the day, you still want to make sure they can academically succeed, shown by how they took the opportunities their school provided them.
Mercy at SocratesPost: What’s more important or interesting to you in a letter of recommendation, then?
Mercy at SocratesPost: Got it. Our conversation today has revolved around CMU increasing access to everybody, which is one of the reasons why you eliminated the interviews and the campus visits. What are your thoughts, then, on the SAT diversity score?
Mercy at SocratesPost: Sure, that’s not a problem.
Mercy at SocratesPost: Earlier you were talking about the admissions committee and how if you had any questions or concerns about an applicant, you would reach out to the committee. Is it that every reader who reads for their school will then have to pass on their recommendation to the committee? What happens if there’s a big disagreement in the committee?
Mercy at SocratesPost: How does shaping the class with CMU’s preferred demographics come into play?
Mercy at SocratesPost: Thanks for that! I have a few questions that readers are interested in asking you.
Kyle Sheu, a reader of SocratesPost: What are some not often thought of character traits that Carnegie Mellon like to see in the student body?
Mercy at SocratesPost: Do you have an example of that?
Mercy at SocratesPost: How does that trait translate into the Carnegie Mellon college experience — as a student?
Mercy at SocratesPost: That is surprising. The rhetoric surrounding getting into college is constantly about being an extroverted leader who’s well respected in the community or someone who is put up on a pedestal. But what you’re saying about how what it takes to succeed specifically at Carnegie Mellon is really interesting. Hopefully your response helps Kyle.
Mercy at SocratesPost: What if the high school doesn’t calculate GPA? How do you view that in admissions?
Mercy at SocratesPost: Can you elaborate on that college credit in high school piece?
Mercy at SocratesPost: Having been a student at Carnegie Mellon, Deborah, what do you think makes Carnegie Mellon’s teaching approach difference?
Mercy at SocratesPost: Does that sort of approach apply to all academic subjects at CMU?
Mercy at SocratesPost: What’s an example of CMU providing opportunities to learn outside of the classroom?
Mercy at SocratesPost: Wow. Going back to the CMU approach, how would you summarize the learning experience there?
Mercy at SocratesPost: It’s great to break down those stereotypes that people have about Carnegie Mellon.
Mercy at SocratesPost: What does that mean: “representative of your knowledge going into Carnegie Mellon?”
Mercy at SocratesPost: That’s clear.
Mercy at SocratesPost: Given that there are no interviews, this seems like an important question.
Mercy at SocratesPost: Does the essay matter as much for STEM students?
Mercy at SocratesPost: What’s something STEM students often write about in their essays because they feel like they have to, not because they really care about it?
Mercy at SocratesPost: Based on the essay contents, are you able to predict who gets in and who doesn’t?
Mercy at SocratesPost: Thanks for that. Those were all the readers’ questions today. I’m curious — what interested you in talking to me today and going through the interview?
Mercy at SocratesPost: Do you have any final thoughts you want to share before we wrap up?
Mercy at SocratesPost: That’s perfect. Just like the Socrates way: ask questions. Thanks so much for your invaluable insights, Deborah.
Liam submitted this question in response to the Carnegie Mellon interview question call. Although this question wasn’t selected for the interview, the admissions director gave us some insight into the coursework and rigor at Carnegie Mellon.
Deborah explained to SocratesPost:
“Carnegie Mellon is a very difficult institution. I can guarantee that if you call a student in each of the different colleges, one of the first things they would say about Carnegie Mellon is that it’s hard. It’s very rigorous…”
- While most universities are trying to enroll more students, this top college is downsizing. Which one is it and why?
- U.S. President Trump spoke at this East Coast university this week without being invited. Which university was it and was this even allowed?
- This 20-year-old college student made money by helping rich but average kids fake their way into college. What did he do to embellish their profiles?
Get answers below.
July 17, 2019 — George Washington University
This top university in Washington D.C. is planning on slashing student enrollment by 20% over 5 years with the goal of providing higher quality education to a smaller student population. How GWU will continue funding itself despite fewer students paying tuition remains to be seen: their tuition revenue comprises more than 60% of total operating revenue.
What does this mean? The school will likely see selectivity increase as acceptance rates plummet in response to the decreasing number of seats. GWU’s strong reputation will retain interest from prospective students.